Get a grip lady, every speech is legal now, thanks to gays!
I find: Jilted ex-boyfriend puts up abortion billboard AP Email Print – 13 mins ago ALAMOGORDO, N.M. – A New Mexico man’s decision to lash out with a billboard ad saying his ex-girlfriend had an abortion against his wishes has touched off a legal debate over free speech and privacy rights. [It’s been decided — anything might be said.]
The sign on Alamogordo’s main thoroughfare shows 35-year-old Greg Fultz holding the outline of an infant. The text reads, “This Would Have Been A Picture Of My 2-Month Old Baby If The Mother Had Decided To Not KILL Our Child!”
Fultz’s ex-girlfriend has taken him to court for harassment and violation of privacy. A domestic court official has recommended the billboard be removed.[the hell you do — free speech is absolute — “Kill fags” is legal, so is “don’t kill babies.”]
But Fultz’s attorney argues the order violates his client’s free speech rights. “As distasteful and offensive as the sign may be to some, for over 200 years in this country the First Amendment protects distasteful and offensive speech,” Todd Holmes said. [Except gay people’s — we still can’t say “I do.” The lying hypocrites.]
The woman’s friends say she had a miscarriage, not an abortion, according to a report in the Albuquerque Journal. Holmes disputes that, saying his case is based on the accuracy of his client’s statement. “My argument is: What Fultz said is the truth,” Holmes said. [truth – you don’t need to stinkin’ truth, you merely need “belief.” Good enough.]
The woman’s lawyer said she had not discussed the pregnancy with her client. But for Ellen Jessen, whether her client had a miscarriage or an abortion is not the point. The central issue is her client’s privacy and the fact that the billboard has caused severe emotional distress, Jessen said. [hahahaaha, you have no idea what ’emotional distress’ is heaped on gay folks with “God hates fags” — and it’s legal.]
“Her private life is not a matter of public interest,” she told the Alamogordo Daily News.[The hell it isn’t – gay guy’s private live is a matter of public interest — see DOMA and all the mini-DOMA’s. And “Liberal” Justice Breyer’s nonsense that there’s a public debate. Oh, debate away, indeed.]
Jessen says her client’s ex-boyfriend has crossed the line. [the hell he hasn’t – there are no lines.]
“Nobody is stopping him from talking about father’s rights. … but a person can’t invade someone’s private life.” [the hell that’s true — heteros invade gay private lives with wild abandon.]
For his part, Holmes invoked the U.S. Supreme Court decision from earlier this year concerning the Westboro Baptist Church, which is known for its anti-gay protests at military funerals and other high-profile events. He believes the high court’s decision to allow the protests, as hurtful as they are, is grounds for his client to put up the abortion billboard. “Very unpopular offensive speech,” he told the Alamogordo Daily News. “The Supreme Court, in an 8 to 1 decision, said that is protected speech.” Holmes says he is going to fight the order to remove the billboard through a District Court appeal. [And it certainly is — “God hates fags” “Gays are dysfunctional” “gay attack marriage” — hell, gays are worthy of death, and that’s “post birth abortion” – -the Supreme Court ruled that saying even “the Supreme Court is a bunch of men in dress is drag queens bitching” is legal. Thanks Supremes.]
[Well, well — I had said — anything might be said – – and screw you if you don’t like it, lady. We have to listen to the most astounding hate and “kill the fags” nonsense — and all you did was kill the man’s baby. And I had nothing to do with that — that’s your choice!
Wow, another court case to protect the spouses and their baby killing — so much for gays are anti-family eh? hahahahaha!
I told you so.
Say what you wish. It’ s all legal now – -if “God Hates Fags” is legal, anything is. Screw you all! Hahahaha! Hallelujah! ]
- Posted in: Uncategorized